[ad_1]
Hooray, everybody’s favorite (former) GBNews producer and anti-cycling bingo fanatic Charlotte Gill is again at it, this time with one thing a bit extra flamboyant and swashbuckling than what her earlier makes an attempt have been, some may say.
Her corridor of fame highlights embrace the article within the eye-openingly conservative journal The Critic, criticising a new study on Low Traffic Neighbourhoods, regardless of failing to deal with any of the examine’s findings, in addition to the elite, deluxe edition of the anti-cycling bingo with a prime of the store coming into, ticking off each single uninspired checkbox: from “a conflict is being waged in opposition to automotive drivers”, “a ‘Lycra Foyer’ of biking activists and eco wonks”, “I don’t drive, get pleasure from biking and doubtless have a comparatively low carbon footprint”, “an assault on democracy”…
Oh earlier than I neglect, she was additionally behind mentioning an argument on Twitter in March that it’s mums who ought to arise and oppose the dreaded Lycra foyer – as a result of they will’t “cart round youngsters” by bike, apparently – a claim swiftly shut down by a great deal of girls posting photos of them doing precisely the identical exercise, together with Tub’s bicycle mayor Saskia Heijltjes.
Gill, who final month left her function as producer at GB Information, was most not too long ago below fireplace for comparing the 20mph speed limit in Wales to cyclists needing stabilisers. I do know the checklist is lengthy…
What occurred once I turned the digital camera on cyclists 🚴♀️ 🎥 https://t.co/8iPa4N8FDn pic.twitter.com/H0j9bwsyOC
— Charlotte Gill (@CharlotteCGill) November 28, 2023
Effectively now, Gill has been on an expedition on the streets of London, and for as soon as, she could not cease herself from applauding a bike owner, albeit just for a tiny little bit of inspiration. Following within the footsteps of 1 “lycra-loving” Jeremy Vine, she strapped on a physique cam (her iPhone) and took to the streets, turning into the “pedestrian model” of the Channel 5 presenter and “play cyclists at their very own sport, filming their transgressions”.
Lo and behold, the inception of the one and solely ‘Chaz Cam’, as christened by her.
She wrote on her blog: “It goes with out saying that cyclists aren’t as harmful as automobiles on common, and naturally, not everybody cycles badly. However too typically you hear “it’s just a few unhealthy eggs giving others a nasty identify” to minimise the variety of naughty cyclists – when the problem is definitely fairly pronounced, as I’ve discovered. I might guess it’s extra like half of cyclists behaving badly on the highway, not a minority.”
Chaz Cam Investigates: Taking my analysis pretending to be Jeremy Vine (to cyclists) extraordinarily severely pic.twitter.com/qE1bQ6hBC9
— Charlotte Gill (@CharlotteCGill) October 25, 2023
And in case you did not really feel like clicking on the hyperlink above this very advantageous day, fear not! Your stay weblog host has completed his homework and browse via Gill’s handiwork, laying down all of the horrible, spiteful and malicious deeds cyclists are chargeable for.
It begins with most likely the most typical one — one which we at highway.cc have additionally introduced up in our discussions on the stay weblog: Going via crimson lights. “I misplaced rely of the variety of cyclists doing this on my time out with the Chaz Cam,” she wrote.
“Though you may say I used to be being pedantic (effectively, I used to be pretending to be the pedestrian model of Jeremy Vine) and that cyclists might as effectively undergo the sunshine if no pedestrians are ready, I discovered they do even when a pedestrian is there. One feminine bike owner dashed out at me as quickly because the pedestrian gentle went inexperienced (see under).
> Are red-light jumping cyclists “great adverts” for cycling? Jeremy Vine seems to think so…
Alright, subsequent up, cyclists on telephones. She stated: “It wasn’t uncommon to see cyclists driving with one hand or none on their handlebars, as if pondering they regarded extraordinarily cool whereas doing so.
“One bike owner, who a van white beeped at, because of his being dangerously shut in entrance, sped away, solely to have a look at one thing apart from the highway (my guess being his telephone).”
Additionally within the findings of the investigation had been the age-old “lighting points” and “driving on the pavement” (cough, yesterday’s live blog involves thoughts, cough). And eventually, she took goal at one other simple goal, supply riders, claiming that they had been simply “unhealthy cyclists” speeding via folks for “tiny sums of cash”.
In conclusion? She stated that the “Chaz Cam investigations” have hardly satisfied her that “the UK is prepared for a biking revolution”.
“The truth, for my part, is that half of cyclists behave effectively, and half of cyclists don’t. It’s undoubtedly not the case that ‘most cyclists comply with the foundations’,” she stated. “They don’t – as a result of they understand themselves as “the inexperienced and the nice” of British society. It’s additionally typically my expertise that almost all cyclists are male (and younger), and probably the most aggressive ones virtually at all times so, countering councils’ propaganda of inclusive transport.”
So if not all cyclists are unhealthy, and those that are don’t trigger nowhere practically as hurt or injury as a nasty motorists, should not by the identical benchmark all of us ought to lend a hand that the UK can also be not prepared for a driving revolution? Ah effectively.
That was fairly a strategy to begin my Wednesday, is that this all a painstakingly fantastic and detailed try at parody or only a awful try with poor arguments for affordable clicks? I really feel I am dropping my thoughts right here, assist me determine this out…
[ad_2]